The Brain Song vs The Memory Wave: BDNF or Brain Cleaning?

Features The Brain Song

The Brain Song

★★★ 3.4/5
The Memory Wave

The Memory Wave

★★★ 3.4/5
Price $39 $39
Guarantee 90 Days 90 Days
Pros
  • ✓ Inexpensive: a one-time $39 digital program.
  • ✓ A simple routine: one 12-minute session a day, on any device.
  • ✓ A 90-day money-back guarantee, confirmed on ClickBank's checkout.
  • ✓ BDNF is a real, well-studied brain protein, and the page's claims are worded cautiously ("may play a role").
  • ✓ Inexpensive: a one-time $39 for a digital program you keep.
  • ✓ A simple routine: one 12-minute session a day, on any device.
  • ✓ A 90-day money-back guarantee, confirmed on ClickBank's checkout.
  • ✓ The research it alludes to - 40 Hz brain stimulation - is real and published, even though it did not test this product.
  • ✓ Softer claims than most brain products: it says it "may help" rather than promising results.
Cons
  • ✗ No published study shows that listening to audio raises BDNF; the best-proven way to raise it is aerobic exercise.
  • ✗ No trial of The Brain Song itself has been published, and the 40 Hz research it borrows from used purpose-built light-and-sound devices for about an hour a day.
  • ✗ Testimonials may be digital avatars of people connected to the creators, according to the page's own small print.
  • ✗ Several look-alike sites claim to be official and describe the product differently; the vendor's own sites are gobrainsong.com and thebrainsong.com.
  • ✗ The vendor's linked refund page is a shared policy written for bottles (60 days); refunds should go through ClickBank instead.
  • ✗ The 40 Hz research behind the pitch was mostly in mice, used purpose-built light-and-sound devices for about an hour a day, and never tested a 12-minute audio download.
  • ✗ No trial of The Memory Wave itself has been published, and the page does not say what frequency or kind of sound it uses.
  • ✗ Testimonials come from paid study participants and possible actor portrayals, according to the page's own small print.
  • ✗ The "team of neuroscientists" behind it is never named.
  • ✗ The vendor's linked refund page is a copied policy for a physical product (60 days, unopened bottles); refunds should go through ClickBank instead.
Action Read Review Read Review Check Price

Scored side by side

Both products run through the same five criteria — see how we score.

Criterion The Brain Song The Memory Wave Edge
Ingredient transparency · 25% 3.5 3.5 Tie
Strength of evidence · 25% 2.0 2.0 Tie
Value for money · 20% 5.0 5.0 Tie
Guarantee terms · 15% 4.0 4.0 Tie
Buying experience · 15% 2.5 3.0 The Memory Wave
Overall 3.4/5 3.4/5 Tie

Comparison Analysis

These two are the same product in different packaging: the same sales template, the same $39 price, the same 12-minute daily session, the same footer and the same 90-day refund through ClickBank. Both aim at gamma brainwaves, and they tie at 3.4 on our rubric.

The pitch

The Brain Song says gamma activity encourages BDNF, a protein that helps brain cells grow and connect. The Memory Wave says gamma activity supports the brain's "cleaning process". Both are real areas of neuroscience; neither has been shown to respond to a 12-minute audio track.

The evidence

The research both borrow from used 40 Hz light-and-sound devices, mostly in mice, for about an hour a day. We found no human study showing that listening to audio raises BDNF — aerobic exercise is the best-established way to do that. Neither product has a published trial.

Testimonials and refunds

The Brain Song's small print says its testimonials may be digital avatars of people connected to the creators; The Memory Wave's says its study participants were paid. Both link to a refund policy written for bottles — ignore it, and request any refund through ClickBank within 90 days, which both checkouts confirm.

Verdict

No winner, and no reason to buy both. If a daily listening routine appeals, pick either one and use the refund window honestly. If your real goal is a healthier brain, a daily brisk walk has better evidence behind it than either.